In Pursuit of a New Content Syndication Model
This week, Attributor, with support from the Fair Syndication Consortium, is taking the first steps in the pursuit of a new model for online content syndication. The model is one in which content creators have the option to be compensated for their content wherever it appears on the Internet by sharing in the advertising revenue generated by the syndication. One can think of this as attempting to do for syndication what AdSense did for advertising.
From day one, we’ve known that this is a complex issue with numerous players, perspectives, interests, and touch points in the content ecosystem, though we remain hopeful a solution that meets the needs of all parties is not only possible, but will provide positive benefits to the entire ecosystem.
We’re motivated by the prospect of a thriving online content economy in which content is shared openly and spread freely, with an infrastructure that supports and fairly compensates content owners and creators.
We want to be completely clear: this model is NOT about content removal. The new model IS about the economics of online content. Our initiative focuses on changing the economic benefits of using unlicensed content and doing so in a manner that strives to do as much as possible to seek an acceptable outcome before removing the content or changing the online experience for consumers. In our view, this is a CRITICAL and watershed point that underscores the very underpinnings of the guidelines and recommendations put forth by the Fair Syndication Consortium. This is about the economy of content and the ads that support it, not the content itself. We trust this is abundantly clear.
With this mission in mind, we want to share the details of this initiative, more specifically about traffic diversion and ad removal actions.
Attributor’s technology, coupled with a team of trained human reviewers, will identify full-copy reuses of unlicensed content for its publishing customers. A “full copy” is any page that contains more than 80% of the original article AND at least 125 words. This definition of full copy was defined collectively by the input of the Fair Syndication Consortium and is intentionally designed to be free of any legitimate fair use claims.
Additionally, only reusing sites with consistent, high frequency instances of full-copy reuse will be party to a graduated response outlined in the Fair Syndication Guidelines, starting with two initial notices.
It should be clear that the combination of a strict definition of full copy reuse along with a pattern of systematic reuse will impact sploggers first and foremost.
This will not impact aggregators, folks who provide original content around portions of other’s work, educational reuse, or any other form of fair use.
The first notice will let a reusing party know that multiple instances of full-copy, unlicensed content reuse has been found on their site and asks whether they have permission to use the articles in question or if they would like to enter into a discussion about fair compensation for syndicating the content. The goal here is to facilitate a discussion and presume that an outcome agreeable for both parties can be achieved.
If for some reason a response from the reusing site is not received within 10 business days, a second notice will be sent alerting the reusing party that the pages – and only the pages with full copies of the reused content – will be removed from the major search engines and any advertisements on the reusing page will be withdrawn. The goal of this step is to further encourage a discussion and agreeable outcome between the reusing party and the content producer.
We feel that assuming a workable outcome is possible is a better alternative than jumping immediately into litigation as other companies and industries have done in the past.
As these notices are sent, we aim to provide accurate results and be transparent in our processes. We recognize that we are still in the early days of the online content economy and we hope to encourage a broader discussion about the industry and potential solutions. Some of this discussion has already started via Ken Doctor and Alan Mutter.
If you have questions or comments about our solution, philosophy or about the traffic diversion and ad removal process, please contact us at fairshare(at)attributor(dot)com.
